It posits that introducing an alternative protocol for such purposes could complicate matters unnecessarily, given that splicing already performs this function. On the other hand, it acknowledges the need for a different protocol for upgrades that do not involve spending the funding output. In this context, dynamic commitments are highlighted as a suitable option, indicating their potential effectiveness in addressing these specific upgrade requirements. This analysis suggests a strategic approach to protocol selection based on the nature of the upgrade, favoring simplicity and efficiency by leveraging existing solutions where applicable and exploring new protocols where necessary.