The proposal includes inviting feedback on potential candidates until a specified deadline, aiming to finalize the addition of new editors based on widespread support. The suggestion emphasizes equal privileges for all editors, particularly highlighting the ability of any editor to assign numbers to BIPs. It's mentioned that guidance could be provided on the numbering process if necessary, but also floats the idea of having a single authority for numbering, provided it does not hinder the workflow.

Furthermore, the email touches upon the approach towards evaluating the technical merit of BIPs, suggesting that this responsibility could be left to the community. This is supported by the practice of marking BIPs as "rejected" in the repository, indicating that the inclusion of a BIP does not necessarily equate to its endorsement or recommendation for implementation. This stance aims to foster a more open and flexible environment for managing BIPs, allowing for a wider range of contributions while maintaining a structured process for evaluation and acceptance.